After reading this, you begin to appreciate the truth in James Watsons theory on African mediocre..

Here goes Lord Frederick Lugard: (Caps mine)

“In character and temperament, the typical African of this race-type is a happy, thriftless, excitable person.

LACKING IN SELF-CONTROL, DISCIPLINE, AND FORESIGHT.
Naturally courageous, and naturally courteous and polite, full of personal vanity, with little sense of veracity, fond of music and loving weapons as an oriental loves jewelry.

HIS THOUGHTS ARE CONCENTRATED ON THE EVENTS AND FEELINGS OF THE MOMENT, and he suffers little from the apprehension for the future,
or grief for the past. His mind is far nearer to the animal world than that of the European or Asiatic, and exhibits something of the animals’
placidity and want of desire to rise beyond the State he has reached.

Through the ages THE AFRICAN APPEARS TO HAVE EVOLVED NO ORGANIZED RELIGIOUS CREED, and though some tribes appear to believe in a deity, the religious sense seldom rises above pantheistic animalism and seems more often to take the form of a vague dread of the supernatural”

“HE LACKS THE POWER OF ORGANIZATION,
and is conspicuously deficient in the management and control alike of men or business. HE LOVES THE DISPLAY OF POWER, but fails to realize its responsibility…he will work hard with a less incentive than most races.

He has the courage of the fighting animal, an instinct rather than a moral virtue… In brief, the virtues and defects of this race-type are those of attractive children, whose confidence when it is won is given ungrudgingly as to an older and wiser superior and without envy…Perhaps the two traits which have impressed me as those most characteristic of the African native are HIS LACK OF APPREHENSION AND HIS LACK OF ABILITY TO VISUALIZE THE FUTURE.”

—Lord Frederick John Dealty Lugard, The Dual Mandate, pg.70 (1926).